Bangladeshi Diplomat Harun Al Rashid Speaks Out Against Yunus’s Regime: A Cry for Justice

In a shocking revelation, Harun Al Rashid, the former Ambassador and Head of Mission at the Embassy of the People's Republic of Bangladesh in Rabat, Morocco, has accused Nobel laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus of orchestrating a violent overthrow of the legitimate government of Bangladesh. Rashid, who recently fled to Canada, made these allegations in a detailed Facebook post that has since gone viral, igniting debates about the country’s political turmoil and the role of Yunus in recent violent events.

Bangladesh’s Descent into Chaos

In his post, Rashid paints a grim picture of Bangladesh’s current state, alleging that the country has been plunged into anarchy under Yunus’s leadership. He claims that the events of August 5, 2024, marked one of the darkest days in the nation’s history—a day when a meticulously planned terrorist attack led to the overthrow of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government.

According to Rashid, this was not an organic uprising but a premeditated act of terror that reshaped the political landscape overnight. “Millions now face an impossible choice: death, exile, or submission to radical extremism,” he wrote.

A Coordinated Terrorist Movement

Rashid claims that for years, digital extremists like Pinaki Bhattacharya and Elias Hossain have used Western nations as platforms to spread anti-government disinformation and fuel unrest in Bangladesh. He argues that these individuals, operating from France and the United States, played key roles in orchestrating the destruction of Bangladesh’s historical landmarks, including the Bangabandhu Memorial Museum.

Within Bangladesh, Rashid points to figures like Farhad Mazhar and Zahedur Rahman, who he alleges have been working to destabilize the country from within by spreading extremist propaganda. These groups, he argues, have manipulated religious sentiments to turn sections of the population against Hindus and India, exploiting existing tensions for political gain.

Erasing Bangladesh’s Secular Identity

Rashid also accuses Yunus of systematically erasing Bangladesh’s secular and cultural identity. He claims that under Yunus’s rule, museums, murals, sculptures, and cultural symbols have been destroyed. Moreover, he alleges that Sufi shrines and Hindu temples have been targeted, leading to widespread persecution of minorities and secularists.

“Bangladesh today is unrecognizable,” he wrote. “Under Yunus, we have become one of the most oppressive regimes for women and minorities, while extremist groups like Hizb ut-Tahrir and Al-Qaeda openly call for an Islamic theocracy.”

A Government of Terrorists?

Perhaps the most alarming claim made by Rashid is that Yunus has actively empowered terrorist elements within his government. According to him, several individuals with links to extremist organizations now hold key government positions, while others have been given the political space to operate freely.

Rashid also alleges that Yunus publicly introduced Mahfuz Alam, whom he describes as the mastermind behind the July-August terrorist attacks, in front of former U.S. President Bill Clinton in New York. He questions why the international community has remained silent in the face of such a blatant endorsement of terrorism.

“How would the French react if someone openly celebrated a terrorist responsible for the Charlie Hebdo massacre? How would Americans react if the mastermind of 9/11 were honored in New York?” Rashid asks, drawing a parallel between Yunus’s actions and global acts of terrorism.

Yunus vs. Sheikh Hasina

In his post, Rashid contrasts Yunus with Sheikh Hasina, arguing that while Hasina worked to build Bangladesh, Yunus has systematically dismantled it. He highlights that Yunus was facing corruption charges before taking power and accuses him of using his position to escape justice.

According to Rashid, Yunus’s financial misconduct includes evading over 6,630 million Bangladeshi Taka in a single case. Despite this, the world continues to view him as a hero due to his Nobel Prize and his past work with microfinance. Rashid argues that Yunus has used this international reputation as a shield to commit widespread atrocities without accountability.

The West’s Selective Outrage

Rashid also points out what he calls the West’s “hypocrisy” in how it treats Bangladesh’s crises. He argues that while Western nations criticize Bangladesh’s garment industry for poor labor conditions, they ignore the exploitative nature of Yunus’s Grameen Bank microloan system, which has left many borrowers trapped in cycles of debt.

“The West is quick to condemn factory conditions but remains silent about the even harsher reality for microloan borrowers,” Rashid wrote. “Why is Yunus exempt from scrutiny?”

A Final Plea for Justice

In closing, Rashid makes a passionate plea to the international community to acknowledge the crimes committed under Yunus’s rule. He argues that history will remember Yunus not as a hero but as a tyrant who manipulated global goodwill to cement his power.

“This is not just a diplomatic note,” he writes. “It is the desperate cry of a man whose country has been stolen, whose life has been shattered for daring to speak the truth.”

Rashid’s post has already sparked discussions both within Bangladesh and abroad. While some critics dismiss his claims as politically motivated, others argue that the international community can no longer ignore the situation in Bangladesh. With the country teetering on the brink of further unrest, Rashid’s words serve as both a warning and a call to action.

The world is watching—will it finally listen?

Milon Syed